Comparison of two methods for describing the strain profiles in quantum dots
C. Pryor, J. Kim, L. W. Wang, A. J. Williamson, A. Zunger
Abstract
The electronic structure of interfaces between lattice-mismatched semiconductor is sensitive to the strain. We compare two approaches for calculating such inhomogeneous strain -- continuum elasticity (CE, treated as a finite difference problem) and atomistic elasticity (AE). While for small strain the two methods must agree, for the large strains that exist between lattice-mismatched III-V semiconductors (e.g. 7% for InAs/GaAs outside the linearity regime of CE) there are discrepancies. We compare the strain profile obtained by both approaches (including the approximation of the correct C2 symmetry by the C4 symmetry in the CE method), when applied to C2-symmetric InAs pyramidal dots capped by GaAs.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Gaussian process coarse-grained potential for Na-montmorillonite
Yalda Pedram, Yaoting Zhang, Laurent Brochard et al.
First-principles theory of phonon renormalization from nonlinear electron-phonon interactions
Florian Kluibenschedl, Matthew Houtput, Jacques Tempere et al.
Spin-Lattice Dynamics and Interactions in Magnonic Spinels
Hari Paudyal, Yuri Suzuki, Michael E. Flatté et al.
Magnon-Phonon Dynamics in Multidimensional Antiferromagnetic Oxides
Yogendra Limbu, Michael E. Flatté, Durga Paudyal
Strain-Induced Metal-to-Insulator Transition in Antiferromagnetic SrCrO3 Thin Films
S. Jöhr, A. Carta, J. Moreno et al.
Tuning the Coercive Field in Ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2-Al2O3 Heterostructures via Interfacial Charge Dynamics
Marshall B. Frye, Chanyoung Kim, Jeong-Woo Sun et al.