Reply to Comment on ``Two-dimensional charged-exciton complexes''
A. Thilagam
Abstract
We respond to criticisms raised by K. Varga (cond-mat/9802262) and reaffirm that the results in our original paper obtained using a two-body analytical method remains valid within the framework of an effective excitonic composite model. The conceptual model of the excitonic systems as well as the numerical method based on variational functions utilized by Varga differ significantly from ours. Hence comparison of binding energies of the charged-biexciton remains questionable. In this reply, we discuss the shortcomings of modelling the charged-biexciton as a five-body system and treating excitonic complexes as atomic systems, as done in Varga's Comment.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Knots in Condensed Matters
Y. M. Cho
Bouchaud's model exhibits two different aging regimes in dimension one
Gerard Ben Arous, Jiri Cerny
Periodic diffraction patterns for 1D quasicrystals
Pawel Buczek, Lorenzo Sadun, Janusz Wolny
Adiabatic association of ultracold molecules via magnetic field tunable interactions
Krzysztof Goral, Thorsten Koehler, Simon A. Gardiner et al.
High-Temperature Atomic Superfluidity in Lattice Boson-Fermion Mixtures
F. Illuminati, A. Albus
Constructive Methods of Invariant Manifolds for Kinetic Problems
A. N. Gorban, I. V. Karlin, A. Yu. Zinovyev