Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"
Klaus Hecker, Helmut Hegger, Alexander Altland, Klaus Fiegle
Abstract
In their comment cond-mat/9710285 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5024 (1998)] den Hartog and van Wees (HW) raise objections against our analysis of the experimental data presented in cond-mat/9708162 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1547 (1997)]. According to HW, we did not account for the quantum phase incoherence introduced by the Niobium compounds of the investigated Nb/Au hybrid samples. Here we show that and why this criticism is not justified. Some difficulties associated with a precise determination of the coherence lengths are discussed. It is discussed why these uncertainties do not have a qualitative impact on the results reported in our paper.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Superconductivity in Pb2-xBixPd Single Crystals
S. Srivastava, R. P. Singh
Type-I superconductivity in a quasi-2D topologically nontrivial YbBi2
Karolina Górnicka, Sudip Malick, Joanna Bławat et al.
Generic thermodynamics of condensates with extremely small superfluid density ---Application to UTe2 and hidden second phase transition---
Kazushige Machida
Vortex-mediated spin current injection into two-dimensional superconductor NbSe2
Meng Yang, Xiaolong Yin, Jingjing Liu et al.
Superconductivity at the metal-insulator phase boundary in a bulk nickelate at ambient pressure
Hyo-Bin Ahn, Xinglong Chen, Hong Zheng et al.
Crystallographic imperfections and exotic superconductivity of UBe13
Andreas Leithe-Jasper, Markus König, Yusei Shimizu et al.