Comment on ``Phase and Phase Diffusion of a Split Bose-Einstein Condensate''
A. J. Leggett, F. Sols
Abstract
Recently Javanainen and Wilkens [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4675 (1997)] have analysed an experiment in which an interacting Bose condensate, after being allowed to form in a single potential well, is "cut" by splitting the well adiabatically with a very high potential barrier, and estimate the rate at which, following the cut, the two halves of the condensate lose the "memory" of their relative phase. We argue that, by neglecting the effect of interactions in the initial state before the separation, they have overestimated the rate of phase randomization by a numerical factor which grows with the interaction strength and with the slowness of the separation process.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Ta-based S-I-S junctions for integrated superconducting Electronics
Trent Borman, Cameron Bullock, Cole Chason et al.
Nonreciprocal charge transport in quantum materials: From superconductors to magnetic systems
Boning Yu, Yalei Huang, Alltrin Dhanarajagopal et al.
Intra-unit-cell Josephson scanning tunneling spectroscopy of the cuprate Bi1.2Pb0.8Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
Fengyu Yao, Jiong Mei, Wenjin Mao et al.
Constraining the Superconducting Gap of Monolayer FeSe/SrTiO3 via Statistical Analysis and Tip-Height-Dependent Tunneling Spectroscopy
Dongwon Shin, Xiyou Peng, Kaleb McClure et al.
Acoustic damping limits superfluid helium as a thermal bath for mechanical resonators
Yunhu Huang, Mehri Ebrahimi, Alireza Rashedi et al.
Superinsulation, electric confinement in condensed matter
M. Cristina Diamantini, Carlo A. Trugenberger