Adaptive Mesh Refinement Computation of Solidification Microstructures using Dynamic Data Structures
Nikolas Provatas, Nigel Goldenfeld, Jonathan Dantzig
Abstract
We study the evolution of solidification microstructures using a phase-field model computed on an adaptive, finite element grid. We discuss the details of our algorithm and show that it greatly reduces the computational cost of solving the phase-field model at low undercooling. In particular we show that the computational complexity of solving any phase-boundary problem scales with the interface arclength when using an adapting mesh. Moreover, the use of dynamic data structures allows us to simulate system sizes corresponding to experimental conditions, which would otherwise require lattices greater that 217× 217 elements. We examine the convergence properties of our algorithm. We also present two dimensional, time-dependent calculations of dendritic evolution, with and without surface tension anisotropy. We benchmark our results for dendritic growth with microscopic solvability theory, finding them to be in good agreement with theory for high undercoolings. At low undercooling, however, we obtain higher values of velocity than solvability theory at low undercooling, where transients dominate, in accord with a heuristic criterion which we derive.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Necessary conditions for benchmarking next-generation AI in materials discovery
Daniel E Widdowson, Tatiana V Kurlina, Olga D Anosova et al.
Doubly Metastable Synthesis for Accelerated Quantum Materials Discovery
Kyuho Lee, Berit H. Goodge, Soonhyun Kwon et al.
Phononic Frequency Combs in Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterostructures from First Principles
Naman Arora, Adarsh Ganesan
Improved screening of doped ZrO2 catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation from graph-based machine learning
Karsten Walz Jensen, Mie Andersen, Raffaele Cheula
Dislocation mediated twin boundary faceting in β-Sn
John Israel, Ian Chesser, Khanh Dang et al.
Ferroelectric Domain-Wall Motion, Stability, and Frequency Responses under Different Screening-Charge Conservation Laws
Sergei V. Kalinin