Comment on ``On loss of quantum coherence in an interacting Fermi gas'' (cond-mat/9810297)
Dmitrii S. Golubev, Andrei D. Zaikin
Abstract
In a recent paper EH Eriksen and Hedegard (EH) claimed that they ``clarified'' our path integral calculation GZ1 and found an error in our analysis. Here we will demonstrate that this claim is based on mathematically incorrect and physically meaningless procedure invented by the authors EH. The main problem in the EH analysis is due to their erroneous calculation of Gaussian path integrals and has nothing to do with the momentum recoil of a particle interacting with an external bath.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Knots in Condensed Matters
Y. M. Cho
Bouchaud's model exhibits two different aging regimes in dimension one
Gerard Ben Arous, Jiri Cerny
Periodic diffraction patterns for 1D quasicrystals
Pawel Buczek, Lorenzo Sadun, Janusz Wolny
Adiabatic association of ultracold molecules via magnetic field tunable interactions
Krzysztof Goral, Thorsten Koehler, Simon A. Gardiner et al.
High-Temperature Atomic Superfluidity in Lattice Boson-Fermion Mixtures
F. Illuminati, A. Albus
Constructive Methods of Invariant Manifolds for Kinetic Problems
A. N. Gorban, I. V. Karlin, A. Yu. Zinovyev