Dynamical Model and Path Integral Formalism for Hubbard Operators
A. Foussats, A. Greco, O. S. Zandron
Abstract
In this paper, the possibility to construct a path integral formalism by using the Hubbard operators as field dynamical variables is investigated. By means of arguments coming from the Faddeev-Jackiw symplectic Lagrangian formalism as well as from the Hamiltonian Dirac method, it can be shown that it is not possible to define a classical dynamics consistent with the full algebra of the Hubbard X-operators. Moreover, from the Faddeev-Jackiw symplectic algorithm, and in order to satisfy the Hubbard X-operators commutation rules, it is possible to determine the number of constraint that must be included in a classical dynamical model. Following this approach it remains clear how the constraint conditions that must be introduced in the classical Lagrangian formulation, are weaker than the constraint conditions imposed by the full Hubbard operators algebra. The consequence of this fact is analyzed in the context of the path integral formalism. Finally, in the framework of the perturbative theory, the diagrammatic and the Feynman rules of the model are discussed.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Metallogenic quantum criticality: Fermi surface nucleation at transitions between gapped phases
Zhengyan Darius Shi
Exact Stiffness and Dynamical Responses from Fock-Space Fragmentation
Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Eslam Khalaf, Zhaoyu Han
A continuous confinement-deconfinement transition in a triangular quantum magnet
Suguru Hosoi, Sejun Park, Michihiro Hirata et al.
Multi-orbital physics in inverse Lieb lattice altermagnets
Mercè Roig, Jannik Gondolf, Andreas Kreisel et al.
3D- (H-theta-phi) magnetic phase diagram of antiferromagnetic metal GdB6 with electron and lattice instability
A. N. Azarevich, A. V. Bogach, T. F. Garipova et al.
Interlayer-engineering of Charge Order Wave Vector in Kagome Metals
Muntafa M. Mahi, Quazi D. M. Khosru, M. Zahid Hasan et al.