Computing and Comparing Semantics of Programs in Multi-valued Logics
Y. Loyer, N. Spyratos, D. Stamate
Abstract
The different semantics that can be assigned to a logic program correspond to different assumptions made concerning the atoms whose logical values cannot be inferred from the rules. Thus, the well founded semantics corresponds to the assumption that every such atom is false, while the Kripke-Kleene semantics corresponds to the assumption that every such atom is unknown. In this paper, we propose to unify and extend this assumption-based approach by introducing parameterized semantics for logic programs. The parameter holds the value that one assumes for all atoms whose logical values cannot be inferred from the rules. We work within multi-valued logic with bilattice structure, and we consider the class of logic programs defined by Fitting. Following Fitting's approach, we define a simple operator that allows us to compute the parameterized semantics, and to compare and combine semantics obtained for different values of the parameter. The semantics proposed by Fitting corresponds to the value false. We also show that our approach captures and extends the usual semantics of conventional logic programs thereby unifying their computation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Compact Quantitative Equational Theories as Monad Restrictions
Matteo Mio, Colin Riba
Universal Construction and Exact Self-Reproduction in Ternary McCulloch-Pitts Networks
Charles C. Norton
Formally Certifying the Vertex Set of a Polyhedron Faster than Informal Enumeration
Xavier Allamigeon, Yazid Id-Sahra, Pierre-Yves Strub
Antichains for Concurrent Parameterized Games
Nathalie Bertrand, Patricia Bouyer, Gaëtan Staquet
An explicit shuffle construction of the homotopy span model of differential linear logic
Paul-André Melliès, Federico Olimpieri, Lionel Vaux Auclair
Modal Extensions of Generalised Nelson Logics
Igor Sedlár, Pietro Vigiani