How to Evaluate your Question Answering System Every Day and Still Get Real Work Done
Eric Breck, John D. Burger, Lisa Ferro, Lynette Hirschman, David House, Marc Light, Inderjeet Mani
Abstract
In this paper, we report on Qaviar, an experimental automated evaluation system for question answering applications. The goal of our research was to find an automatically calculated measure that correlates well with human judges' assessment of answer correctness in the context of question answering tasks. Qaviar judges the response by computing recall against the stemmed content words in the human-generated answer key. It counts the answer correct if it exceeds agiven recall threshold. We determined that the answer correctness predicted by Qaviar agreed with the human 93% to 95% of the time. 41 question-answering systems were ranked by both Qaviar and human assessors, and these rankings correlated with a Kendall's Tau measure of 0.920, compared to a correlation of 0.956 between human assessors on the same data.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RetireOPD: Self-Retiring On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Yan Yu, Zhengxi Lu, Yizhou Liu et al.
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations
Sarah Wyer, Sue Black, Noura Al Moubayed
dQwen3.5: Hybrid-Attention Diffusion Language Models
Anton Xue, Litu Rout, Aditya Akella et al.
On-Demand Attention: Language Models Know When to Recall
Haibo Feng, Ruiqi Liang, Hanyang Peng et al.
Summarization Bias: The Directional Collapse of Objective Projection into Told-Mode Labels in Large Language Models --- A Conceptual Framework and Registered Test Protocol
Levent Bulut
HerHealthEval: Evaluating Multilingual and Register-Sensitive Understanding of Women's Health Communication
Hassan Saeed Hassan Albattra, Mazen Mohammed Bahgat, Rahatara Ferdousi et al.