Comparing two trainable grammatical relations finders
Alexander Yeh
Abstract
Grammatical relationships (GRs) form an important level of natural language processing, but different sets of GRs are useful for different purposes. Therefore, one may often only have time to obtain a small training corpus with the desired GR annotations. On such a small training corpus, we compare two systems. They use different learning techniques, but we find that this difference by itself only has a minor effect. A larger factor is that in English, a different GR length measure appears better suited for finding simple argument GRs than for finding modifier GRs. We also find that partitioning the data may help memory-based learning.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RetireOPD: Self-Retiring On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Yan Yu, Zhengxi Lu, Yizhou Liu et al.
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations
Sarah Wyer, Sue Black, Noura Al Moubayed
dQwen3.5: Hybrid-Attention Diffusion Language Models
Anton Xue, Litu Rout, Aditya Akella et al.
On-Demand Attention: Language Models Know When to Recall
Haibo Feng, Ruiqi Liang, Hanyang Peng et al.
Summarization Bias: The Directional Collapse of Objective Projection into Told-Mode Labels in Large Language Models --- A Conceptual Framework and Registered Test Protocol
Levent Bulut
HerHealthEval: Evaluating Multilingual and Register-Sensitive Understanding of Women's Health Communication
Hassan Saeed Hassan Albattra, Mazen Mohammed Bahgat, Rahatara Ferdousi et al.