More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences
Alexander Yeh
Abstract
Statistical significance testing of differences in values of metrics like recall, precision and balanced F-score is a necessary part of empirical natural language processing. Unfortunately, we find in a set of experiments that many commonly used tests often underestimate the significance and so are less likely to detect differences that exist between different techniques. This underestimation comes from an independence assumption that is often violated. We point out some useful tests that do not make this assumption, including computationally-intensive randomization tests.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RetireOPD: Self-Retiring On-Policy Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Yan Yu, Zhengxi Lu, Yizhou Liu et al.
Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations
Sarah Wyer, Sue Black, Noura Al Moubayed
dQwen3.5: Hybrid-Attention Diffusion Language Models
Anton Xue, Litu Rout, Aditya Akella et al.
On-Demand Attention: Language Models Know When to Recall
Haibo Feng, Ruiqi Liang, Hanyang Peng et al.
Summarization Bias: The Directional Collapse of Objective Projection into Told-Mode Labels in Large Language Models --- A Conceptual Framework and Registered Test Protocol
Levent Bulut
HerHealthEval: Evaluating Multilingual and Register-Sensitive Understanding of Women's Health Communication
Hassan Saeed Hassan Albattra, Mazen Mohammed Bahgat, Rahatara Ferdousi et al.