The Rectilinear Crossing Number of K10 is 62
Alex Brodsky, Stephane Durocher, Ellen Gethner
Abstract
A drawing of a graph G in the plane is said to be a rectilinear drawing of G if the edges are required to be line segments (as opposed to Jordan curves). We assume no three vertices are collinear. The rectilinear crossing number of G is the fewest number of edge crossings attainable over all rectilinear drawings of G. Thanks to Richard Guy, exact values of the rectilinear crossing number of Kn, the complete graph on n vertices, for n = 3,...,9, are known (Guy 1972, White and Beinke 1978, Finch 2000, Sloanes A014540). Since 1971, thanks to the work of David Singer (1971, Gardiner 1986), the rectilinear crossing number of K10 has been known to be either 61 or 62, a deceptively innocent and tantalizing statement. The difficulty of determining the correct value is evidenced by the fact that Singer's result has withstood the test of time. In this paper we use a purely combinatorial argument to show that the rectilinear crossing number of K10 is 62. Moreover, using this result, we improve an asymptotic lower bound for a related problem. Finally, we close with some new and old open questions that were provoked, in part, by the results of this paper, and by the tangled history of the problem itself.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Boxicity of Power Graphs of Finite Nilpotent Groups
L. Sunil Chandran, Jinia Ghosh, Suraj Kumar Sahoo
Monadically Dependent Graph Classes Have Almost Bounded Merge-Width
Jan Dreier, Nikolas Mählmann, Michał Pilipczuk et al.
A Polynomial Erdős-Pósa bound for Eulerian digraphs
Esther Galby, Roohani Sharma, Bart van der Steenhoven
How Unbalanced Must a Latin Rectangle Be?
Zhengyu Li, Vijay Ganesh
Classifying K-Geodetic Graphs Via Combinatorial Designs and Distance-regularity
Carlos E. Frasser
Graph Similarity Meets Optimal Transport
Jens Breitung, Timo Gervens, Martin Grohe