The Partial Evaluation Approach to Information Personalization
Naren Ramakrishnan, Saverio Perugini
Abstract
Information personalization refers to the automatic adjustment of information content, structure, and presentation tailored to an individual user. By reducing information overload and customizing information access, personalization systems have emerged as an important segment of the Internet economy. This paper presents a systematic modeling methodology - PIPE (`Personalization is Partial Evaluation') - for personalization. Personalization systems are designed and implemented in PIPE by modeling an information-seeking interaction in a programmatic representation. The representation supports the description of information-seeking activities as partial information and their subsequent realization by partial evaluation, a technique for specializing programs. We describe the modeling methodology at a conceptual level and outline representational choices. We present two application case studies that use PIPE for personalizing web sites and describe how PIPE suggests a novel evaluation criterion for information system designs. Finally, we mention several fundamental implications of adopting the PIPE model for personalization and when it is (and is not) applicable.
Create a lesson
Related papers
From a Large-Scale Teacher to Efficient Multimodal Students for Search Relevance Prediction
Tomasz Gniazdowski, Mohammadreza Momenifar, Nadia Vase et al.
Tackling the Modality Inhibitance Effect with Wavelet-based Modality Integration in Multi-modal Recommendation
Rongqing Kenneth Ong, Andy W. H. Khong
Recall Begets Recall: Recurrent Memory Ranking for Personalized LLMs
Pengyue Jia, Shida Yan, Shunyu Liu et al.
UniSGR-V2: Stepwise Target-Side Feature Anticipation and Crossing for Generative Recommendation
Jun Yang, Jiasi Chen, Jiawei Sun et al.
OT-FlowRec: Optimal Transport-Guided Multi-Bridge Flow for Multimodal Sequential Recommendation
Miao Sun
Personalized LLM Recommendation with Semantic IDs: Autoregressive Beam Search vs. Multi-Token Prediction
Sejoon Oh, Fernando Amat Gil, Evan Smothers et al.