The Role of Institutions in the Design of Communication Technologies
Rajiv C. Shah, Jay P. Kesan
Abstract
Communication technologies contain embedded values that affect our society's fundamental values, such as privacy, freedom of speech, and the protection of intellectual property. Researchers have shown the design of technologies is not autonomous but shaped by conflicting social groups. Consequently, communication technologies contain different values when designed by different social groups. Continuing in this vein, we show that the institutions where communication technologies are designed and developed are an important source of the values of communication technologies. We use the term code to collectively refer to the hardware and software of communication technologies. Institutions differ in their motivations, structure, and susceptibility to external influences. First, we focus on the political, economic, social, and legal influences during the development of code. The institutional reactions to these influences are embodied in code. Second, we focus on the decision-making issues in the review process for code. This process determines the code's content and affects the dissemination of code through the decision whether to publicly release the code. We found these factors vary by institution. As a result, institutions differ in the values that they incorporate into code or communications technologies.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Unmitigated? How are the world's largest companies responding to AI risks?
Alexander K. Saeri, Jess Graham, Michael Noetel et al.
From Guidelines to Practice: Defining Requirements for AI Red-Teaming Tools
Gia Phong Tran, Thai Duong Huynh, Randolph Loh et al.
Harder Than the Task: From Technical to Organizational Difficulty in AI Benchmarking
Victor Barres, Aden Barton, Nicolai J. Foss et al.
Reducing SNAP Payment Errors at Lower Cost With AI: A Simulation Study
Alex Chohlas-Wood
From Simulation to Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Purpose-Driven Framework for Advanced EV Charging Technology Transfer
Shangqing Wang, Syed Irtaza Haider, Shiwei Shen et al.
LLMs and the Organization of Scientific Work
Stefano Bianchini, Georgiana-Ioana Coroama