Nonmonotonic inference operations
Michael Freund, Daniel Lehmann
Abstract
A. Tarski proposed the study of infinitary consequence operations as the central topic of mathematical logic. He considered monotonicity to be a property of all such operations. In this paper, we weaken the monotonicity requirement and consider more general operations, inference operations. These operations describe the nonmonotonic logics both humans and machines seem to be using when infering defeasible information from incomplete knowledge. We single out a number of interesting families of inference operations. This study of infinitary inference operations is inspired by the results of Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor on finitary nonmonotonic operations, but this paper is self-contained.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Can Language Models Play the Wikipedia Game?
Alexander Hickey, Joanna Knight, James Bishop
RATED: Reliability-Aware AI Agent Tool Retrieval via Execution Dynamics
Weiliang Chen, Song Liao
X-AgentRed: Red-Teaming Personal Agents in Evolving Multi-Service Ecosystems
Yeonsung Jung, Zhiyuan Wang, Zifan Wang et al.
Studying Comics at Scale with Artificial Intelligence: The PAGE Framework and Three Studies of American Comics and Japanese Manga
Emilio Ferrara
UkrMeme: Multimodal Explainable Persuasion Detection in Ukrainian Memes
Nazar Andrushko, Vera Schmitt, Veronika Solopova
A Privileged Teacher That Only Scores Cannot Search: Critique-Conditioned On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning
Mayug Maniparambil, Ayush Rai, Ekansh Verma et al.