The Prioritized Inductive Logic Programs
Shilong Ma, Yuefei Sui, Ke Xu
Abstract
The limit behavior of inductive logic programs has not been explored, but when considering incremental or online inductive learning algorithms which usually run ongoingly, such behavior of the programs should be taken into account. An example is given to show that some inductive learning algorithm may not be correct in the long run if the limit behavior is not considered. An inductive logic program is convergent if given an increasing sequence of example sets, the program produces a corresponding sequence of the Horn logic programs which has the set-theoretic limit, and is limit-correct if the limit of the produced sequence of the Horn logic programs is correct with respect to the limit of the sequence of the example sets. It is shown that the GOLEM system is not limit-correct. Finally, a limit-correct inductive logic system, called the prioritized GOLEM system, is proposed as a solution.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Double-Rollout Reinforcement Learning with Sampling-based Reward Estimation
Haifeng Qian, David Mosallanezhad, Christian Munley et al.
G2WAM: World Action Models for Efficient and Geometry Grounded Image-Goal Navigation
Ke Gui, Chenghao Shi, Ziyue Wang et al.
AI Discovery in Combinatorics: From Problems to Solutions and Back to Bigger Problems
Eugenio Cainelli, Lorenzo Luccioli, Alessandro Iraci et al.
Making Language the Low-Rate Code of Vision: Successive Refinement from Words to Pixels
Ruilin Gong, Hao Gong
Overtaught, Underlearned: Learner-Centered Distillation from Multi-Agent Discussion
Mengtao Zhou, Jianxiao Wang, Xiupeng Chen et al.
Does the Explanation Drift Before the Guarantee? Label-Free Early Warning on Evolving Graphs
Tomasz Szandała, Damian Raczkowski