A continuation semantics of interrogatives that accounts for Baker's ambiguity
Chung-chieh Shan
Abstract
Wh-phrases in English can appear both raised and in-situ. However, only in-situ wh-phrases can take semantic scope beyond the immediately enclosing clause. I present a denotational semantics of interrogatives that naturally accounts for these two properties. It neither invokes movement or economy, nor posits lexical ambiguity between raised and in-situ occurrences of the same wh-phrase. My analysis is based on the concept of continuations. It uses a novel type system for higher-order continuations to handle wide-scope wh-phrases while remaining strictly compositional. This treatment sheds light on the combinatorics of interrogatives as well as other kinds of so-called A'-movement.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models
Taoyong Cui, Pinxian Zeng, Wanghan Xu et al.
When VLMs Destroy What They Know: Spatial Representations Fall Below Lexical Priors
Shubh Garg, Chen Shani
Structural Automata for Neural Semantic Parsing
Xiao Zhang
Task Context Shapes Component Roles in Language Models
Sovesh Mohapatra, Dani S Bassett
Can Language Models Learn When to Abstain? Policy Learning and Calibrated Answer Selection
Juan Terven, Diana-Margarita Córdova-Esparza, Ruben Gomez et al.
Error Rate is Not Enough: Costs of Augmentation in Low-Resource ASR
Katsumi Ibaraki, David Chiang