Measuring Praise and Criticism: Inference of Semantic Orientation from Association
Peter D. Turney, Michael L. Littman
Abstract
The evaluative character of a word is called its semantic orientation. Positive semantic orientation indicates praise (e.g., "honest", "intrepid") and negative semantic orientation indicates criticism (e.g., "disturbing", "superfluous"). Semantic orientation varies in both direction (positive or negative) and degree (mild to strong). An automated system for measuring semantic orientation would have application in text classification, text filtering, tracking opinions in online discussions, analysis of survey responses, and automated chat systems (chatbots). This paper introduces a method for inferring the semantic orientation of a word from its statistical association with a set of positive and negative paradigm words. Two instances of this approach are evaluated, based on two different statistical measures of word association: pointwise mutual information (PMI) and latent semantic analysis (LSA). The method is experimentally tested with 3,596 words (including adjectives, adverbs, nouns, and verbs) that have been manually labeled positive (1,614 words) and negative (1,982 words). The method attains an accuracy of 82.8% on the full test set, but the accuracy rises above 95% when the algorithm is allowed to abstain from classifying mild words.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Tev: Scaling Long-Horizon Agentic Environments with Dense Progress Rewards
Wenbo Hu, Shraman Pramanick, Krishna Kumar Singh et al.
DoubtLess: Training-Free Contrastive Decoding for Efficient Reasoning
Minghao Luo, Liang Chen
Hybrid Reasoning Agents
Jiaru Zou, Yunzhe Qi, Sirui Chen et al.
Back-Translation Still Matters: Leveraging Monolingual Data for Low-Resource Machine Translation with LLMs
Divyanshu Bathla, Parag Singla, Jitin Singla
Where Do LLM Ensemble Gains Come From? Decomposing Candidate Value, Diversity, and Aggregation
Donghwan Kim
Rubrics from the Task, Verdicts from Evidence: Pointwise Rubric Rewards with Tool-Augmented Judges
Tianci Liu, Haoyu Wang