Collective Intelligence Quanitifed for Computer-Mediated Group Problem Solving
Dan Steinbock, Craig Kaplan, Marko Rodriguez, Juana Diaz, Newton Der, Suzanne Garcia
Abstract
Collective Intelligence (CI) is the ability of a group to exhibit greater intelligence than its individual members. Expressed by the common saying that "two minds are better than one," CI has been a topic of interest for social psychology and the information sciences. Computer mediation adds a new element in the form of distributed networks and group support systems. These facilitate highly organized group activities that were all but impossible before computer mediation. This paper presents experimental findings on group problem solving where a distributed software system automatically integrates input from many humans. In order to quantify Collective Intelligence, we compare the performance of groups to individuals when solving a mathematically formalized problem. This study shows that groups can outperform individuals on difficult but not easy problems, though groups are slower to produce solutions. The subjects are 57 university students. The task is the 8-Puzzle sliding tile game.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Harnessing Generative UI for Education: Tailored Learning Interactives
Alisa Kovshov, Anisha Choudhury, Anna Iurchenko et al.
When Does the Public Become Suspicious of Bots? Demand-Side Evidence from Botometer Query Logs
Tuğrulcan Elmas
Welfare-Opaque Income: Taxation under AI-Agent Delegation
Yukun Zhang, Kemu Xu, Yishen Chen
Detecting Deceptive Recruitment: A Signal-theoretic Machine Learning Framework for Early Identification of Labour Exploitation
Sajid Siraj, Mahnaz Hosseinzadeh, Amin Vafadarnikjoo et al.
Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systems
Rudrendu Kumar Paul, Sourav Nandy
Who Decides? Agency and Legitimacy in Digital Educational Systems
Eriam Schaffter, Ahmed Bounekkar