Experimental Comparison of Classification Uncertainty for Randomised and Bayesian Decision Tree Ensembles
V. Schetinin, D. Partridge, W. J. Krzanowski, R. M. Everson, J. E. Fieldsend, T. C. Bailey, A. Hernandez
Abstract
In this paper we experimentally compare the classification uncertainty of the randomised Decision Tree (DT) ensemble technique and the Bayesian DT technique with a restarting strategy on a synthetic dataset as well as on some datasets commonly used in the machine learning community. For quantitative evaluation of classification uncertainty, we use an Uncertainty Envelope dealing with the class posterior distribution and a given confidence probability. Counting the classifier outcomes, this technique produces feasible evaluations of the classification uncertainty. Using this technique in our experiments, we found that the Bayesian DT technique is superior to the randomised DT ensemble technique.
Create a lesson
Related papers
RAFT: A Stateful Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Troubleshooting Agents
Mingxuan Zhang, Xiaowen Wang, Anupma Sharan et al.
Q&A on Any Spreadsheet Requires Interpreting Its Grid Structure
Zofia Smoleń
Deep Noir: Autonomous Steering Discovery via Architectural Chronometry in Transformer Models
Frank E. Bobe, Gregory D. Vetaw, Darshan W. Bryner et al.
Ownership in AI-Assisted Everyday Tasks
Megan Wei, Melanie Subbiah, Audrey Lee et al.
PAA: The Probabilistic Allen Algebra: A Generative and Complete Probabilistic Extension of Allen's Interval Relations
Julian Eggert
Limits of Confidence in Diffusion
Russ Webb, Amitis Shidani, Alice Bizeul et al.