Proving or Disproving likely Invariants with Constraint Reasoning
Tristan Denmat, Arnaud Gotlieb, Mireille Ducasse
Abstract
A program invariant is a property that holds for every execution of the program. Recent work suggest to infer likely-only invariants, via dynamic analysis. A likely invariant is a property that holds for some executions but is not guaranteed to hold for all executions. In this paper, we present work in progress addressing the challenging problem of automatically verifying that likely invariants are actual invariants. We propose a constraint-based reasoning approach that is able, unlike other approaches, to both prove or disprove likely invariants. In the latter case, our approach provides counter-examples. We illustrate the approach on a motivating example where automatically generated likely invariants are verified.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spotlights: Discovering Improvement Opportunities in Software Repositories
Udi Barzelay, Ophir Azulai, Idan Friedman et al.
Assessing the Construct Validity of Object-Oriented, Class-Level Code Quality Metrics
Hera Arif, Miikka Kuutila, Paul Ralph
AdaRepair-Mem: Adaptive Experience Orchestration for Repository-Level Program Repair
Z. C. Luo, J. C. Guo, W. J. He et al.
HapCiD: Detecting API-related Compatibility Issues in OpenHarmony Apps
Daihang Chen, Yonghui Liu, Mingyi Zhou et al.
EviRCA: Decoupling Evidence Extraction from Reasoning for Microservice Root-Cause Analysis
Yuhao Wang, Zhen Qin, Xingliang Wang et al.
A Closed-Loop Control Architecture for Reliable Constraint Satisfaction in LLM Text Generation
Quan Zhou, Shahbaz Siddeeq, Mika Saari et al.