Sparse Matrix Implementation in Octave
David Bateman, Andy Adler
Abstract
There are many classes of mathematical problems which give rise to matrices, where a large number of the elements are zero. In this case it makes sense to have a special matrix type to handle this class of problems where only the non-zero elements of the matrix are stored. Not only does this reduce the amount of memory to store the matrix, but it also means that operations on this type of matrix can take advantage of the a-priori knowledge of the positions of the non-zero elements to accelerate their calculations. A matrix type that stores only the non-zero elements is generally called sparse. Until recently Octave has lacked a full implementation of sparse matrices. This article address the implementation of sparse matrices within Octave, including their storage, creation, fundamental algorithms used, their implementations and the basic operations and functions implemented for sparse matrices. Mathematical issues such as the return types of sparse operations, matrix fill-in and reordering for sparse matrix factorization is discussed in the context of a real example. Benchmarking of Octave's implementation of sparse operations compared to their equivalent in Matlab are given and their implications discussed. Results are presented for multiplication and linear algebra operations for various matrix orders and densities. Furthermore, the use of Octave's sparse matrix implementation is demonstrated using a real example of a finite element model (FEM) problem. Finally, the method of using sparse matrices with Octave's oct-files is discussed. The means of creating, using and returning sparse matrices within oct-files is discussed as well as the differences between Octave's Sparse and Array classes.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The Pauli Lightcone: Information-Theoretic Error Mitigation Beyond the Autocorrelation
Paolo D'Alberto
Opal.jl: a comprehensive, composable framework for data assimilation in Julia
Nicholas Mueller
ADDA: a Modular Framework for Representing, Simulating and Assimilating Dynamics with End-to-end Differentiability
Anthony Frion, Vien Minh Nguyen-Thanh, Ali Can Bekar et al.
Eigensolvers for polynomial roots and tensor decomposition
Enrica Barrilli, Bernard Mourrain
DSLHyPE-a DSL kernel language for the Exascale Hyperbolic PDE Engine ExaHyPE
Timothy J. R. Stokes, Nick Brown, Thomas A. Flynn et al.
Tensor Network Kernel Machines: A JAX Framework for Machine Learning and Nonlinear System Identification
Albert Saiapin, Kim Batselier