Nearly optimal exploration-exploitation decision thresholds
Christos Dimitrakakis
Abstract
While in general trading off exploration and exploitation in reinforcement learning is hard, under some formulations relatively simple solutions exist. In this paper, we first derive upper bounds for the utility of selecting different actions in the multi-armed bandit setting. Unlike the common statistical upper confidence bounds, these explicitly link the planning horizon, uncertainty and the need for exploration explicit. The resulting algorithm can be seen as a generalisation of the classical Thompson sampling algorithm. We experimentally test these algorithms, as well as ε-greedy and the value of perfect information heuristics. Finally, we also introduce the idea of bagging for reinforcement learning. By employing a version of online bootstrapping, we can efficiently sample from an approximate posterior distribution.
Create a lesson
Related papers
From AutoResearch to Continual AutoResearch: Do Agents Learn Across Tasks?
Jeremy Qin, Ruizhi Deng, Mohamed Osama Ahmed et al.
The Platonic Brain: Representational Convergence in EEG Foundation Models
Nicolas Waehner, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Jacobo Sitt et al.
LatentTriad: Pre-Action Risk Representations for Malicious Agent Skill Detection
Zhe Yu, Yi Liu, Ying Zhang et al.
ALBI: LLM-Guided Inductive Logic Programming via Iterative Generate-Test-Constrain Refineme
Aboubaker Seddiq Benterki, Jüri Vain, Gert Kanter et al.
Artifact-to-Capability: Diagnosing Breaks in Capability Formation of Self-Evolving Agents in a Controlled Environment
Ziqian Ban, Haoxiang Yang, Yanfei Zhang et al.
FourSight: Stable FP4 RL Post-Training via Sequence Filtering and Sparse Channel Compensation
Yining Wei, Tianyuan Wu, Gu Gong et al.