Cohomology in Grothendieck Topologies and Lower Bounds in Boolean Complexity II: A Simple Example
Joel Friedman
Abstract
In a previous paper we have suggested a number of ideas to attack circuit size complexity with cohomology. As a simple example, we take circuits that can only compute the AND of two inputs, which essentially reduces to SET COVER. We show a very special case of the cohomological approach (one particular free category, using injective and superskyscraper sheaves) gives the linear programming bound coming from the relaxation of the standard integer programming reformulation of SET COVER.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Pseudodeterminism and MA != NPBPP in Communication Complexity
Thomas Watson
Group Isomorphism and the Polylogarithmic-Time Hierarchy: Depth-212 Circuits and Lower Bounds
Joshua A. Grochow, Gülce Kardeş, Michael Levet
Continuous Computational Social Choice: A Case Study in Bribery
Martin Koutecký, Nikolaos Melissinos, Tung Anh Vu et al.
Pseudorandom Functions in NC1 from LWE/LPN/CDH (Or: How to Build PRFs in NC1, Generically)
Youlong Ding, Aayush Jain, Ilan Komargodski
Parameterized Complexity of Lp-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and Lp-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes
Aritra Das, Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo et al.
Exact CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals
Jiaqi Liu, Yansong Feng, Yanbin Pan