Probabilistic Automata for Computing with Words
Yongzhi Cao, Lirong Xia, Mingsheng Ying
Abstract
Usually, probabilistic automata and probabilistic grammars have crisp symbols as inputs, which can be viewed as the formal models of computing with values. In this paper, we first introduce probabilistic automata and probabilistic grammars for computing with (some special) words in a probabilistic framework, where the words are interpreted as probabilistic distributions or possibility distributions over a set of crisp symbols. By probabilistic conditioning, we then establish a retraction principle from computing with words to computing with values for handling crisp inputs and a generalized extension principle from computing with words to computing with all words for handling arbitrary inputs. These principles show that computing with values and computing with all words can be respectively implemented by computing with some special words. To compare the transition probabilities of two near inputs, we also examine some analytical properties of the transition probability functions of generalized extensions. Moreover, the retractions and the generalized extensions are shown to be equivalence-preserving. Finally, we clarify some relationships among the retractions, the generalized extensions, and the extensions studied recently by Qiu and Wang.
Create a lesson
Related papers
WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution
Liyan Tang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Chun-Sung Ferng et al.
Mechanistic Reaction Prediction via Discrete Flow Matching on Graph-Structured Electron Occupation
Nguyen Xuan-Vu, Octavian Susanu, Daniel Armstrong et al.
Learning a Continuous Sepsis Severity Score Without Hour-by-Hour Supervision: A Two-Site Retrospective Study
Kevin Zhu, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed et al.
CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases
Sil Hamilton, Albert Yu Sun, Oscar J. Romero et al.
Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm
Nicholas J. Hallman, Zachary T. Kowaleski, Anu Puvvada et al.
Not All Eval-Awareness Is Equal: Capabilities Framing Predicts Compliance
Allison Zhuang, Santiago Aranguri