An Algorithm to Determine Peer-Reviewers
Marko A. Rodriguez, Johan Bollen
Abstract
The peer-review process is the most widely accepted certification mechanism for officially accepting the written results of researchers within the scientific community. An essential component of peer-review is the identification of competent referees to review a submitted manuscript. This article presents an algorithm to automatically determine the most appropriate reviewers for a manuscript by way of a co-authorship network data structure and a relative-rank particle-swarm algorithm. This approach is novel in that it is not limited to a pre-selected set of referees, is computationally efficient, requires no human-intervention, and, in some instances, can automatically identify conflict of interest situations. A useful application of this algorithm would be to open commentary peer-review systems because it provides a weighting for each referee with respects to their expertise in the domain of a manuscript. The algorithm is validated using referee bid data from the 2005 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Gender and the Production of Research Impact
Sanger Wagner, Charles Rahal, Melinda C. Mills
A Comparative Evaluation of Digitization Pipelines for Historiographical Sources
Marina Gómez Rey, Patricia Callejo, Mario Muñoz-Organero et al.
COCI: Conference Organisers and Content Identifier
Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Alexis Vizcaino et al.
Towards a Definition of the Computational Architecture of Open Scholarly Infrastructures
Ivan Heibi, Mario Petrella, Angelo Di Iorio et al.
Beyond FAIR Data: Instrument Traces for Active and Autonomous Scientific Experimentation
Sergei V. Kalinin, Boris N. Slautin, Yu Liu et al.
Taxonomy-aware distances between scholarly topic profiles via an exact simplex embedding
Dmitry Gubanov, Alexander Chkhartishvili