Improved Exponential Time Lower Bound of Knapsack Problem under BT model
Xin Li, Tian Liu, Han Peng, Hongtao Sun, Jiaqi Zhu
Abstract
M.Alekhnovich et al. recently have proposed a model of algorithms, called BT model, which covers Greedy, Backtrack and Simple Dynamic Programming methods and can be further divided into fixed, adaptive and fully adaptive three kinds, and have proved exponential time lower bounds of exact and approximation algorithms under adaptive BT model for Knapsack problem which are Ω(2n/2/ n)=Ω(20.5n/ n) and Ω((1/ε)1/3.17)≈Ω((1/ε)0.315)(for approximation ratio 1-ε) respectively (M. Alekhovich, A. Borodin, J. Buresh-Oppenheim, R. Impagliazzo, A. Magen, and T. Pitassi, Toward a Model for Backtracking and Dynamic Programming, Proceedings of Twentieth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp308-322, 2005). In this note, we slightly improved their lower bounds to Ω(2(2-ε)n/3/n)≈ Ω(20.66n/n) and Ω((1/ε)1/2.38)≈Ω((1/ε)0.420), and proposed as an open question what is the best achievable lower bounds for knapsack under adaptive BT models.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Pseudodeterminism and MA != NPBPP in Communication Complexity
Thomas Watson
Group Isomorphism and the Polylogarithmic-Time Hierarchy: Depth-212 Circuits and Lower Bounds
Joshua A. Grochow, Gülce Kardeş, Michael Levet
Continuous Computational Social Choice: A Case Study in Bribery
Martin Koutecký, Nikolaos Melissinos, Tung Anh Vu et al.
Pseudorandom Functions in NC1 from LWE/LPN/CDH (Or: How to Build PRFs in NC1, Generically)
Youlong Ding, Aayush Jain, Ilan Komargodski
Parameterized Complexity of Lp-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and Lp-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes
Aritra Das, Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo et al.
Exact CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals
Jiaqi Liu, Yansong Feng, Yanbin Pan