Lack of Finite Characterizations for the Distance-based Revision
Jonathan Ben-Naim
Abstract
Lehmann, Magidor, and Schlechta developed an approach to belief revision based on distances between any two valuations. Suppose we are given such a distance D. This defines an operator |D, called a distance operator, which transforms any two sets of valuations V and W into the set V |D W of all elements of W that are closest to V. This operator |D defines naturally the revision of K by A as the set of all formulas satisfied in M(K) |D M(A) (i.e. those models of A that are closest to the models of K). This constitutes a distance-based revision operator. Lehmann et al. characterized families of them using a loop condition of arbitrarily big size. An interesting question is whether this loop condition can be replaced by a finite one. Extending the results of Schlechta, we will provide elements of negative answer. In fact, we will show that for families of distance operators, there is no "normal" characterization. Approximatively, a normal characterization contains only finite and universally quantified conditions. These results have an interest of their own for they help to understand the limits of what is possible in this area. Now, we are quite confident that this work can be continued to show similar impossibility results for distance-based revision operators, which suggests that the big loop condition cannot be simplified.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Challenging Benchmarks for Diagrammatic Equivalence of Circuits in TPTP and SMT-LIB
Julie Cailler, Noé Delorme, Sophie Tourret
Dynamic Polyhedral Logic
Nick Bezhanishvili, Laura Bussi, Vincenzo Ciancia et al.
Exact SAT and Constraint Programming for Job Shop Scheduling with Time-Varying Peak Power Constraints
Huy Tuan Nguyen, Duc Trung Kim Nguyen, Khanh To Van
Cycle time minimization for the simple assembly line balancing problem under peak power constraints
Bao Gia Hoang, Tuyen Van Kieu, Khanh Van To
Design and Empirical Characterization of a Hardware-Realized Turing Machine with Automated Card-Based Programming
Agrima Regmi, Jenish Pant, Pratistha Sapkota et al.
Comparison Invariants for Verifying Control Invariance
Promit Panja, André Platzer