Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts
Matt Thomas, Bo Pang, Lillian Lee
Abstract
We investigate whether one can determine from the transcripts of U.S. Congressional floor debates whether the speeches represent support of or opposition to proposed legislation. To address this problem, we exploit the fact that these speeches occur as part of a discussion; this allows us to use sources of information regarding relationships between discourse segments, such as whether a given utterance indicates agreement with the opinion expressed by another. We find that the incorporation of such information yields substantial improvements over classifying speeches in isolation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
CritICL: Inference-Time Weak-to-Strong Generalization from Small Language Model Failure Modes
Yufan Wu, Yinghui He, Zhengyi Hu et al.
TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
Aozhe Wang, Zhengxi Lu, Jianze Wang et al.
Stochastic Estimation of Transduced Language Models
Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Samuel Kiegeland, Manuel de Prada Corral et al.
Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
Xingyu Shen, Huishuai Zhang, Peng Li et al.
Consolidating RLVR Capabilities Across Domains: A Deep Dive into Fusion Paradigms
Siye Wu, Kai Yang, Yuchen Cai et al.
How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge
Orion Reblitz-Richardson