On the freeze quantifier in Constraint LTL: decidability and complexity
Stéphane Demri, Ranko Lazic, David Nowak
Abstract
Constraint LTL, a generalisation of LTL over Presburger constraints, is often used as a formal language to specify the behavior of operational models with constraints. The freeze quantifier can be part of the language, as in some real-time logics, but this variable-binding mechanism is quite general and ubiquitous in many logical languages (first-order temporal logics, hybrid logics, logics for sequence diagrams, navigation logics, logics with lambda-abstraction etc.). We show that Constraint LTL over the simple domain (N,=) augmented with the freeze quantifier is undecidable which is a surprising result in view of the poor language for constraints (only equality tests). Many versions of freeze-free Constraint LTL are decidable over domains with qualitative predicates and our undecidability result actually establishes Sigma11-completeness. On the positive side, we provide complexity results when the domain is finite (EXPSPACE-completeness) or when the formulae are flat in a sense introduced in the paper. Our undecidability results are sharp (i.e. with restrictions on the number of variables) and all our complexity characterisations ensure completeness with respect to some complexity class (mainly PSPACE and EXPSPACE).
Create a lesson
Related papers
Challenging Benchmarks for Diagrammatic Equivalence of Circuits in TPTP and SMT-LIB
Julie Cailler, Noé Delorme, Sophie Tourret
Dynamic Polyhedral Logic
Nick Bezhanishvili, Laura Bussi, Vincenzo Ciancia et al.
Exact SAT and Constraint Programming for Job Shop Scheduling with Time-Varying Peak Power Constraints
Huy Tuan Nguyen, Duc Trung Kim Nguyen, Khanh To Van
Cycle time minimization for the simple assembly line balancing problem under peak power constraints
Bao Gia Hoang, Tuyen Van Kieu, Khanh Van To
Design and Empirical Characterization of a Hardware-Realized Turing Machine with Automated Card-Based Programming
Agrima Regmi, Jenish Pant, Pratistha Sapkota et al.
Comparison Invariants for Verifying Control Invariance
Promit Panja, André Platzer