Nonlinear Estimators and Tail Bounds for Dimension Reduction in l1 Using Cauchy Random Projections
Ping Li, Trevor J. Hastie, Kenneth W. Church
Abstract
For dimension reduction in l1, the method of Cauchy random projections multiplies the original data matrix A ∈Rn× D with a random matrix R ∈ RD× k (k(n,D)) whose entries are i.i.d. samples of the standard Cauchy C(0,1). Because of the impossibility results, one can not hope to recover the pairwise l1 distances in A from B = AR ∈ Rn× k, using linear estimators without incurring large errors. However, nonlinear estimators are still useful for certain applications in data stream computation, information retrieval, learning, and data mining. We propose three types of nonlinear estimators: the bias-corrected sample median estimator, the bias-corrected geometric mean estimator, and the bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator. The sample median estimator and the geometric mean estimator are asymptotically (as k ∞) equivalent but the latter is more accurate at small k. We derive explicit tail bounds for the geometric mean estimator and establish an analog of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma for dimension reduction in l1, which is weaker than the classical JL lemma for dimension reduction in l2. Asymptotically, both the sample median estimator and the geometric mean estimators are about 80% efficient compared to the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). We analyze the moments of the MLE and propose approximating the distribution of the MLE by an inverse Gaussian.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Product Structure Meets Track Layouts
Michael A. Bekos, Giordano Da Lozzo, Petr Hliněný et al.
The Randomized Query Complexity of Finding Minimal Elements in Bounded-Width Posets
Luyao Fan, Jiayang Zou, Jiayang Gao et al.
On the Instance Optimality of Bidirectional Dijkstra's Algorithm
Matic Požar
Hadamard Flattening and Gaussian Pooling Sketch for Least Squares with Coordinate-wise Guarantee
Zhao Song, Lichen Zhang
Cheaper by the Batch: Shared Traversal for Genotype Graph Editing
Aaron Li, Yifan Li, Drew DeHaas et al.
Unpublished Draft: A Post-Processing Approach to Fairness in Tie-Aware Rankings
Somya Nigam, Johan Springael, Kenneth Sörensen