Loop corrections for approximate inference
Joris Mooij, Bert Kappen
Abstract
We propose a method for improving approximate inference methods that corrects for the influence of loops in the graphical model. The method is applicable to arbitrary factor graphs, provided that the size of the Markov blankets is not too large. It is an alternative implementation of an idea introduced recently by Montanari and Rizzo (2005). In its simplest form, which amounts to the assumption that no loops are present, the method reduces to the minimal Cluster Variation Method approximation (which uses maximal factors as outer clusters). On the other hand, using estimates of the effect of loops (obtained by some approximate inference algorithm) and applying the Loop Correcting (LC) method usually gives significantly better results than applying the approximate inference algorithm directly without loop corrections. Indeed, we often observe that the loop corrected error is approximately the square of the error of the approximate inference method used to estimate the effect of loops. We compare different variants of the Loop Correcting method with other approximate inference methods on a variety of graphical models, including "real world" networks, and conclude that the LC approach generally obtains the most accurate results.
Create a lesson
Related papers
WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution
Liyan Tang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Chun-Sung Ferng et al.
Mechanistic Reaction Prediction via Discrete Flow Matching on Graph-Structured Electron Occupation
Nguyen Xuan-Vu, Octavian Susanu, Daniel Armstrong et al.
Learning a Continuous Sepsis Severity Score Without Hour-by-Hour Supervision: A Two-Site Retrospective Study
Kevin Zhu, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed et al.
CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases
Sil Hamilton, Albert Yu Sun, Oscar J. Romero et al.
Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm
Nicholas J. Hallman, Zachary T. Kowaleski, Anu Puvvada et al.
Not All Eval-Awareness Is Equal: Capabilities Framing Predicts Compliance
Allison Zhuang, Santiago Aranguri