Improving Precision of Type Analysis Using Non-Discriminative Union
Lunjin Lu
Abstract
This paper presents a new type analysis for logic programs. The analysis is performed with a priori type definitions; and type expressions are formed from a fixed alphabet of type constructors. Non-discriminative union is used to join type information from different sources without loss of precision. An operation that is performed repeatedly during an analysis is to detect if a fixpoint has been reached. This is reduced to checking the emptiness of types. Due to the use of non-discriminative union, the fundamental problem of checking the emptiness of types is more complex in the proposed type analysis than in other type analyses with a priori type definitions. The experimental results, however, show that use of tabling reduces the effect to a small fraction of analysis time on a set of benchmarks. Keywords: Type analysis, Non-discriminative union, Abstract interpretation, Tabling
Create a lesson
Related papers
Tacet: A Language and Type System for Automatic Statistical Validity Accounting
Chiké Abuah
You may implement this later: Cofunctors as partial implementations
Vincent Wang-Maścianica
Direct Manipulation and Natural Language Programming, Together at Last?
Parker Ziegler, David Minh-Duy Cao, Justin Lubin et al.
A Programming Paradigm for Spatiotemporal Composability
Yifan Shi, Wei Zhang, Tianyi Cui
MGQL: An Executable, Small-Step Semantics of GQL
Aditya Thimmaiah, Tong-Nong Lin, Milos Gligoric
NoC-Out: A Formally-verified Network-on-Chip Library for Rule-based Hardware Designs
Max Kurze, František Farka, Sebastian Ertel