Adventures in time and space
Norman Danner, James S. Royer
Abstract
This paper investigates what is essentially a call-by-value version of PCF under a complexity-theoretically motivated type system. The programming formalism, ATR, has its first-order programs characterize the polynomial-time computable functions, and its second-order programs characterize the type-2 basic feasible functionals of Mehlhorn and of Cook and Urquhart. (The ATR-types are confined to levels 0, 1, and 2.) The type system comes in two parts, one that primarily restricts the sizes of values of expressions and a second that primarily restricts the time required to evaluate expressions. The size-restricted part is motivated by Bellantoni and Cook's and Leivant's implicit characterizations of polynomial-time. The time-restricting part is an affine version of Barber and Plotkin's DILL. Two semantics are constructed for ATR. The first is a pruning of the naive denotational semantics for ATR. This pruning removes certain functions that cause otherwise feasible forms of recursion to go wrong. The second semantics is a model for ATR's time complexity relative to a certain abstract machine. This model provides a setting for complexity recurrences arising from ATR recursions, the solutions of which yield second-order polynomial time bounds. The time-complexity semantics is also shown to be sound relative to the costs of interpretation on the abstract machine.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Challenging Benchmarks for Diagrammatic Equivalence of Circuits in TPTP and SMT-LIB
Julie Cailler, Noé Delorme, Sophie Tourret
Dynamic Polyhedral Logic
Nick Bezhanishvili, Laura Bussi, Vincenzo Ciancia et al.
Exact SAT and Constraint Programming for Job Shop Scheduling with Time-Varying Peak Power Constraints
Huy Tuan Nguyen, Duc Trung Kim Nguyen, Khanh To Van
Cycle time minimization for the simple assembly line balancing problem under peak power constraints
Bao Gia Hoang, Tuyen Van Kieu, Khanh Van To
Design and Empirical Characterization of a Hardware-Realized Turing Machine with Automated Card-Based Programming
Agrima Regmi, Jenish Pant, Pratistha Sapkota et al.
Comparison Invariants for Verifying Control Invariance
Promit Panja, André Platzer