On the Computational Complexity of Defining Sets
Hamed Hatami, Hossein Maserrat
Abstract
Suppose we have a family F of sets. For every S ∈ F, a set D ⊂eq S is a defining set for ( F,S) if S is the only element of F that contains D as a subset. This concept has been studied in numerous cases, such as vertex colorings, perfect matchings, dominating sets, block designs, geodetics, orientations, and Latin squares. In this paper, first, we propose the concept of a defining set of a logical formula, and we prove that the computational complexity of such a problem is Σ2-complete. We also show that the computational complexity of the following problem about the defining set of vertex colorings of graphs is Σ2-complete: Instance: A graph G with a vertex coloring c and an integer k. Question: If C(G) be the set of all χ(G)-colorings of G, then does ( C(G),c) have a defining set of size at most k? Moreover, we study the computational complexity of some other variants of this problem.
Create a lesson
Related papers
How far is Kolmogorov-Loveland randomness from Martin-Löf randomness?
Tomislav Petrović
The Complexity of Finding Additional Solutions
Saman Farhat
On the Hardness of 4-to-1 Games with Perfect Completeness
Yumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo Wang
Near-Inverse-Linear Barriers for Explicit Affine Witness Isolation
Sebastian Ben Daniel
∃ R ⊂eq CH
Alex Meiburg
Primal/Dual Method for the Grothendieck Constant
Steven Heilman, Chris Jones, Giulio Malavolta