Predicate Abstraction with Under-approximation Refinement
Corina S. Pasareanu, Radek Pelanek, Willem Visser
Abstract
We propose an abstraction-based model checking method which relies on refinement of an under-approximation of the feasible behaviors of the system under analysis. The method preserves errors to safety properties, since all analyzed behaviors are feasible by definition. The method does not require an abstract transition relation to be generated, but instead executes the concrete transitions while storing abstract versions of the concrete states, as specified by a set of abstraction predicates. For each explored transition the method checks, with the help of a theorem prover, whether there is any loss of precision introduced by abstraction. The results of these checks are used to decide termination or to refine the abstraction by generating new abstraction predicates. If the (possibly infinite) concrete system under analysis has a finite bisimulation quotient, then the method is guaranteed to eventually explore an equivalent finite bisimilar structure. We illustrate the application of the approach for checking concurrent programs.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A Nearly Tight Lower Bound for Matroid Intersection Prophet Inequalities
Dimitris Fotakis, Charalampos Platanos, Thanos Tolias
Faster Verification of PJR+ via Mincuts
Drew Springham
Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Bandits
Lishang Xu, Guodong Ma, Pengcheng Weng et al.
A Logarithmic Regret Bound for Optimistic Hedge in General-Sum Games
Junsoo Ha
Condorcet-type properties of the linear ordering problem with ties
Daichi Kawashima, Noriyoshi Sukegawa
On Periodic and Aperiodic Optimal Strategies in Solvency Games
Quentin Guilmant, Florian Luca, Richard Mayr et al.