Natural Deduction as Higher-Order Resolution
Lawrence C. Paulson
Abstract
An interactive theorem prover, Isabelle, is under development. In LCF, each inference rule is represented by one function for forwards proof and another (a tactic) for backwards proof. In Isabelle, each inference rule is represented by a Horn clause. Resolution gives both forwards and backwards proof, supporting a large class of logics. Isabelle has been used to prove theorems in Martin-Löf's Constructive Type Theory. Quantifiers pose several difficulties: substitution, bound variables, Skolemization. Isabelle's representation of logical syntax is the typed lambda-calculus, requiring higher- order unification. It may have potential for logic programming. Depth-first subgoaling along inference rules constitutes a higher-order Prolog.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Compact Quantitative Equational Theories as Monad Restrictions
Matteo Mio, Colin Riba
Universal Construction and Exact Self-Reproduction in Ternary McCulloch-Pitts Networks
Charles C. Norton
Formally Certifying the Vertex Set of a Polyhedron Faster than Informal Enumeration
Xavier Allamigeon, Yazid Id-Sahra, Pierre-Yves Strub
Antichains for Concurrent Parameterized Games
Nathalie Bertrand, Patricia Bouyer, Gaëtan Staquet
An explicit shuffle construction of the homotopy span model of differential linear logic
Paul-André Melliès, Federico Olimpieri, Lionel Vaux Auclair
Modal Extensions of Generalised Nelson Logics
Igor Sedlár, Pietro Vigiani