Translating near-synonyms: Possibilities and preferences in the interlingua
Philip Edmonds
Abstract
This paper argues that an interlingual representation must explicitly represent some parts of the meaning of a situation as possibilities (or preferences), not as necessary or definite components of meaning (or constraints). Possibilities enable the analysis and generation of nuance, something required for faithful translation. Furthermore, the representation of the meaning of words, especially of near-synonyms, is crucial, because it specifies which nuances words can convey in which contexts.
Create a lesson
Related papers
CritICL: Inference-Time Weak-to-Strong Generalization from Small Language Model Failure Modes
Yufan Wu, Yinghui He, Zhengyi Hu et al.
TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
Aozhe Wang, Zhengxi Lu, Jianze Wang et al.
Stochastic Estimation of Transduced Language Models
Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Samuel Kiegeland, Manuel de Prada Corral et al.
Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
Xingyu Shen, Huishuai Zhang, Peng Li et al.
Consolidating RLVR Capabilities Across Domains: A Deep Dive into Fusion Paradigms
Siye Wu, Kai Yang, Yuchen Cai et al.
How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge
Orion Reblitz-Richardson