Comparing a statistical and a rule-based tagger for German
Martin Volk, Gerold Schneider
Abstract
In this paper we present the results of comparing a statistical tagger for German based on decision trees and a rule-based Brill-Tagger for German. We used the same training corpus (and therefore the same tag-set) to train both taggers. We then applied the taggers to the same test corpus and compared their respective behavior and in particular their error rates. Both taggers perform similarly with an error rate of around 5%. From the detailed error analysis it can be seen that the rule-based tagger has more problems with unknown words than the statistical tagger. But the results are opposite for tokens that are many-ways ambiguous. If the unknown words are fed into the taggers with the help of an external lexicon (such as the Gertwol system) the error rate of the rule-based tagger drops to 4.7%, and the respective rate of the statistical taggers drops to around 3.7%. Combining the taggers by using the output of one tagger to help the other did not lead to any further improvement.
Create a lesson
Related papers
CritICL: Inference-Time Weak-to-Strong Generalization from Small Language Model Failure Modes
Yufan Wu, Yinghui He, Zhengyi Hu et al.
TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
Aozhe Wang, Zhengxi Lu, Jianze Wang et al.
Stochastic Estimation of Transduced Language Models
Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Samuel Kiegeland, Manuel de Prada Corral et al.
Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
Xingyu Shen, Huishuai Zhang, Peng Li et al.
Consolidating RLVR Capabilities Across Domains: A Deep Dive into Fusion Paradigms
Siye Wu, Kai Yang, Yuchen Cai et al.
How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge
Orion Reblitz-Richardson