On the Power of Positive Turing Reductions
Edith Hemaspaandra
Abstract
In the early 1980s, Selman's seminal work on positive Turing reductions showed that positive Turing reduction to NP yields no greater computational power than NP itself. Thus, positive Turing and Turing reducibility to NP differ sharply unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. We show that the situation is quite different for DP, the next level of the boolean hierarchy. In particular, positive Turing reduction to DP already yields all (and only) sets Turing reducibility to NP. Thus, positive Turing and Turing reducibility to DP yield the same class. Additionally, we show that an even weaker class, P(NP[1]), can be substituted for DP in this context.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Marton's conjecture in polynomial time
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Sabee Grewal et al.
Efficient Randomized Communication Without Large Monochromatic Rectangles
Haoyu Wang, Pei Wu
On the Turing Completeness of Transformers and Agents
Yimu Qiao, Lijia Yu, Ruichen Qiu et al.
Dense Pinwheel Packing Is Strongly NP-Complete
Yusuke Kobayashi, Bingkai Lin, Joseph Swernofsky
A Separation Between Distribution-Free SQ Learning and Dimension Complexity
Shyamal Patel
Almost Optimal FPT Inapproximability for k-SetCover
Venkatesan Guruswami, Xuandi Ren