R1-ttSN(NP) Distinguishes Robust Many-One and Turing Completeness
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, Harald Hempel
Abstract
Do complexity classes have many-one complete sets if and only if they have Turing-complete sets? We prove that there is a relativized world in which a relatively natural complexity class-namely a downward closure of NP, - has Turing-complete sets but has no many-one complete sets. In fact, we show that in the same relativized world this class has 2-truth-table complete sets but lacks 1-truth-table complete sets. As part of the groundwork for our result, we prove that has many equivalent forms having to do with ordered and parallel access to and .
Create a lesson
Related papers
Pseudodeterminism and MA != NPBPP in Communication Complexity
Thomas Watson
Group Isomorphism and the Polylogarithmic-Time Hierarchy: Depth-212 Circuits and Lower Bounds
Joshua A. Grochow, Gülce Kardeş, Michael Levet
Continuous Computational Social Choice: A Case Study in Bribery
Martin Koutecký, Nikolaos Melissinos, Tung Anh Vu et al.
Pseudorandom Functions in NC1 from LWE/LPN/CDH (Or: How to Build PRFs in NC1, Generically)
Youlong Ding, Aayush Jain, Ilan Komargodski
Parameterized Complexity of Lp-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and Lp-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes
Aritra Das, Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo et al.
Exact CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals
Jiaqi Liu, Yansong Feng, Yanbin Pan