The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) Versus SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity
John Swain
Abstract
Recent attempts to resolve the ambiguity in the loop quantum gravity description of the quantization of area has led to the idea that j=1 edges of spin-networks dominate in their contribution to black hole areas as opposed to j=1/2 which would naively be expected. This suggests that the true gauge group involved might be SO(3) rather than SU(2) with attendant difficulties. We argue that the assumption that a version of the Pauli principle is present in loop quantum gravity allows one to maintain SU(2) as the gauge group while still naturally achieving the desired suppression of spin-1/2 punctures. Areas come from j=1 punctures rather than j=1/2 punctures for much the same reason that photons lead to macroscopic classically observable fields while electrons do not.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spin-network states for the Bianchi I and IX cosmological models from quantum constrained symmetries
Matteo Bruno, Giovanni Montani, Edoardo Maria Panno
Entropy, area, and the choice of regulator during gravitational collapse
Jana N. Guenther, Christian Hoelbling, Sophie Mutzel et al.
On the Extended Kerr-Newman-Bertotti-Robinson Spacetime: Two Black Holes and a Naked Singularity in Bertotti-Robinson Universe
Yu-Sen Zhou, Wen-Tao Fu, Li-Ming Cao et al.
The return of Palatini inflationary attractors: Universal mapping of observables
Christian Dioguardi, Francesco Gianesello, Antonio Racioppi
Gravity from Invariant Weyl-Integrable space-time (IWIST)
José Edgar Madriz Aguilar, A. Bernal, M. Montes et al.
Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild--AdS black holes with a near-horizon reflective surface
Libo Xie, Liang-Bi Wu, Yu-Sen Zhou et al.