What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity?
Domenico Giulini
Abstract
On his way to General Relativity (GR) Einstein gave several arguments as to why a special relativistic theory of gravity based on a massless scalar field could be ruled out merely on grounds of theoretical considerations. We re-investigate his two main arguments, which relate to energy conservation and some form of the principle of the universality of free fall. We find that such a theory-based a priori abandonment not to be justified. Rather, the theory seems formally perfectly viable, though in clear contradiction with (later) experiments. This may be of interest to those who teach GR and/or have an active interest in its history.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spin-network states for the Bianchi I and IX cosmological models from quantum constrained symmetries
Matteo Bruno, Giovanni Montani, Edoardo Maria Panno
Entropy, area, and the choice of regulator during gravitational collapse
Jana N. Guenther, Christian Hoelbling, Sophie Mutzel et al.
On the Extended Kerr-Newman-Bertotti-Robinson Spacetime: Two Black Holes and a Naked Singularity in Bertotti-Robinson Universe
Yu-Sen Zhou, Wen-Tao Fu, Li-Ming Cao et al.
The return of Palatini inflationary attractors: Universal mapping of observables
Christian Dioguardi, Francesco Gianesello, Antonio Racioppi
Gravity from Invariant Weyl-Integrable space-time (IWIST)
José Edgar Madriz Aguilar, A. Bernal, M. Montes et al.
Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild--AdS black holes with a near-horizon reflective surface
Libo Xie, Liang-Bi Wu, Yu-Sen Zhou et al.