On Physical Equivalence between Nonlinear Gravity Theories
Guido Magnano, Leszek M. Sokolowski
Abstract
We argue that in a nonlinear gravity theory, which according to well-known results is dynamically equivalent to a self-gravitating scalar field in General Relativity, the true physical variables are exactly those which describe the equivalent general-relativistic model (these variables are known as Einstein frame). Whenever such variables cannot be defined, there are strong indications that the original theory is unphysical. We explicitly show how to map, in the presence of matter, the Jordan frame to the Einstein one and backwards. We study energetics for asymptotically flat solutions. This is based on the second-order dynamics obtained, without changing the metric, by the use of a Helmholtz Lagrangian. We prove for a large class of these Lagrangians that the ADM energy is positive for solutions close to flat space. The proof of this Positive Energy Theorem relies on the existence of the Einstein frame, since in the (Helmholtz--)Jordan frame the Dominant Energy Condition does not hold and the field variables are unrelated to the total energy of the system.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Multimessenger astrophysics drives the case for an Australian Gravitational-Wave observatory
Fiona H. Panther, Paul D. Lasky, Nikhil Sarin
Binary black hole mergers in massive Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Harry L. H. Shum, Llibert Aresté Saló, Miguel Bezares et al.
Noisy pipelines II: Non-parametric Noise Inference for LISA
Charlie Hoy, Joseph Bayley, Ollie Burke et al.
Quasi-Normal Modes of Covariant Loop Quantum Black Holes
Chao Zhang, Sushant G. Ghosh, Anzhong Wang
Kerr metric perturbations for second-order self-force theory
Benjamin Leather, Samuel D. Upton, Patrick Bourg et al.
Multi-domain spectral method for Kerr spacetimes: a hyperboloidal Teukolsky m-mode solver for self-force computations
Brad Cownden, Rodrigo Panosso Macedo, Christiana Pantelidou et al.