Comment on "Comparison of approaches to classical signature change"
Sean A. Hayward
Abstract
This is a comment on a reply (gr-qc/9601040) to a comment (gr-qc/9606045) on a paper of Hellaby & Dray (gr-qc/9404001), repeating the identification of an important mistake which is still being denied by the authors: their proposed solutions do not satisfy the Einstein- Klein-Gordon equations at a change of signature. Substitution of the proposed solutions into the Einstein-Klein-Gordon equations in unit normal coordinates yields Dirac delta terms describing source layers at the junction. Hellaby & Dray's criticisms of this straightforward calculation are absurd: it does not involve "imaginary time", it does not involve a "modified form" of the field equations, and it is "purely classical". Moreover, Hellaby & Dray's latest attempt to lose the delta terms is mathematically invalid, involving division by zero and products of distributions, hinging on an identity whose incorrectness may be checked by substitution.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Emergent vacua and stability constraints on black hole solutions in higher-dimensional f(R) gravity
Nicolás Trullols Sandino, Andrei Galiautdinov
Electric and magnetic Penrose processes, charged-particle collisions and superradiance around a Lorentz-violating dyonic black hole
Fernando M. Belchior, Edilberto O. Silva
Conformal Cyclic Cosmology from Varying Fundamental Constants
Konrad Marosek, Adam Balcerzak
Perturbations of black holes with primary hair: time evolutions, quasinormal modes and greybody factors
Georgios Antoniou
Gravitational Lensing of Hayward Black Holes with EFT-Corrected Photon Propagation
Takamasa Kanai
Near-Horizon BMS Symmetry and Implications on Black Hole Entropy
Nihar Ranjan Ghosh, Malay K. Nandy