The two-phase approximation for black hole collisions: Is it robust?
John Baker, Chun Biu Li
Abstract
Recently Abrahams and Cook devised a method of estimating the total radiated energy resulting from collisions of distant black holes by applying Newtonian evolution to the holes up to the point where a common apparent horizon forms around the two black holes and subsequently applying Schwarzschild perturbation techniques . Despite the crudeness of their method, their results for the case of head-on collisions were surprisingly accurate. Here we take advantage of the simple radiated energy formula devised in the close-slow approximation for black hole collisions to test how strongly the Abrahams-Cook result depends on the choice of moment when the method of evolution switches over from Newtonian to general relativistic evolution. We find that their result is robust, not depending strongly on this choice.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Multimessenger astrophysics drives the case for an Australian Gravitational-Wave observatory
Fiona H. Panther, Paul D. Lasky, Nikhil Sarin
Binary black hole mergers in massive Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Harry L. H. Shum, Llibert Aresté Saló, Miguel Bezares et al.
Noisy pipelines II: Non-parametric Noise Inference for LISA
Charlie Hoy, Joseph Bayley, Ollie Burke et al.
Quasi-Normal Modes of Covariant Loop Quantum Black Holes
Chao Zhang, Sushant G. Ghosh, Anzhong Wang
Kerr metric perturbations for second-order self-force theory
Benjamin Leather, Samuel D. Upton, Patrick Bourg et al.
Multi-domain spectral method for Kerr spacetimes: a hyperboloidal Teukolsky m-mode solver for self-force computations
Brad Cownden, Rodrigo Panosso Macedo, Christiana Pantelidou et al.