Enhancing the physical significance of Frequentist confidence intervals
C. Giunti
Abstract
It is shown that all the Frequentist methods are equivalent from a statistical point of view, but the physical significance of the confidence intervals depends on the method. The Bayesian Ordering method is presented and confronted with the Unified Approach in the case of a Poisson process with background. Some criticisms to both methods are answered. It is also argued that a general Frequentist method is not needed.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A machine-learning method for the estimation of the background from jets misidentified as hadronic tau lepton decays
CMS Collaboration
Recent results in b → s\, transitions at LHCb
Juan Jose Juan Castella
Determination of U-spin breaking parameters with an amplitude analysis of the decay D0 KS,L0π+π-
BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov et al.
Observation of a Threshold Enhancement in the π0π0 Mass Spectrum in ψ(3686) → π0π0J/ψ Decays
BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov et al.
HepUKE: Uncertainty-aware Knowledge Evolution for High Energy Physics Analysis Agents
Zijie Shang, Ke Li, Junkun Jiao et al.
A compact, interrogable Tree Tensor Network Jet Tagger on Lund declustering trees
Fabrizio Napolitano, Luca Della Penna, Tommaso Tedeschi et al.