Reply to Boglione and Pennington
W. Lee, D. Weingarten
Abstract
In a recent article we presented an argument which, we believe, shows to be incorrect an estimate, by Boglione and Pennington, of corrections to the valence (quenched) approximation predictions for properties of the lightest scalar glueball. Boglione and Pennington's reply to our article, it appears to us, fails to address the specific technical issues we raised.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Electromagnetic form factors of vector mesons in Einstein-dilaton holographic QCD
Alfonso Ballon-Bayona, Tobias Frederico, Luis A. H. Mamani et al.
An invertible map between 3D Breit-frame mechanical distributions and 2D infinite-momentum-frame mechanical densities in spin-1 hadrons
Kemal Tezgin
Adiabatic hydrodynamization with transverse spatial gradients in boost-invariant plasmas
Uri Sharell, Jasmine Brewer, Weiyao Ke
Line shapes of Ω(2012) production in the Ξ K and Ξπ K decay channels
Natsumi Ikeno, Eulogio Oset
A quantum representation of π fragmentation functions through variational quantum circuits
David F. Rentería-Estrada, Roger J. Hernández-Pinto, Germán Rodrigo et al.
Particle Physics Driven by Quantum Technology - Quantum Simulations and Quantum Sensing
Itay M. Bloch, Marcela Carena, Yifan Chen et al.