Why Nature has made a choice of one time and three space coordinates?
N. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen
Abstract
We propose a possible answer to one of the most exciting open questions in physics and cosmology, that is the question why we seem to experience four- dimensional space-time with three ordinary and one time dimensions. We have known for more than 70 years that (elementary) particles have spin degrees of freedom, we also know that besides spin they also have charge degrees of freedom, both degrees of freedom in addition to the position and momentum degrees of freedom. We may call these ''internal degrees of freedom '' the ''internal space'' and we can think of all the different particles, like quarks and leptons, as being different internal states of the same particle. The question then naturally arises: Is the choice of the Minkowski metric and the four-dimensional space-time influenced by the ''internal space''? Making assumptions (such as particles being in first approximation massless) about the equations of motion, we argue for restrictions on the number of space and time dimensions. (Actually the Standard model predicts and experiments confirm that elementary particles are massless until interactions switch on masses.) Accepting our explanation of the space-time signature and the number of dimensions would be a point supporting (further) the importance of the ''internal space''.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The LZ inelastic splitting as a probe of anomaly mediation
Seung J. Lee, Taewook Youn
Precision Tokenization for Multi-Modal Data in High Energy Physics
Jeffrey Krupa, Samuel Klein, Nilotpal Kakati et al.
Complete four-loop pressure of cold QED
Aapeli Kärkkäinen, Pablo Navarrete, Mika Nurmela et al.
Long-Distance Contributions to Light Vector Mesons and Radiative Decays of ηc
Xiao-Yu Qi, Qi Wu, Dian-Yong Chen
Utilizing Neural Networks for Solving Functional Renormalization Group Flow Equations
J. Gurzó, G. Fejős
ALP interactions with mesons and baryons at O(1/fa): a general field redefinition invariant approach
Jorge Alda, Stefano Rigolin