Reply to a Comment of article ``Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay''

Abstract

After our publication of the observed first indication for neutrinoless double beta decay in [KK-Evid01], a number of papers have been published [KK-SarEvid01,KK2-SarEvid01,KK3-SarEvid01,Ma02-Ev,Barg02-Ev,Ueh02-Ev,Mi n-Evid02,Chat-Evid02,Xing-Evid02,Ham-Evid02,Ahl-Kirch-Evid02,Ma-Evid2-02,Hab-Su z02,Mohap02-Evid,Kays02-Evid,Fodor02-Evid,Pakv02-Evid,Rodej02-Evid,Kowal02,Niel s02,He02-Evid,Josh02-Evid,Bran02-Evid,Cheng02-Evid,Smirn02-Evid,Wiss-Evid02] discussing its implications. In addition a 'Comment' has been put to the Internet February 7, 2002, [Comm-Evid02] ( version 1) critisizing our publication [KK-Evid01]. (Meanwhile six of the nine claims in the 'Comment' have been withdrawn [Comm-Evid02] ( version 3).) It is the purpose of this note to show that none of their claims is justified (the same is true, from the same arguments, for the criticism raised recently in [Harn-Id02]). We shall show this by answering this 'Comment' point by point.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…